Atheism and Spirituality

I’m sure you would say that atheism and spirituality are mutually exclusive. That is an atheist MUST reject anything remotely spiritual.

I am of the opinion that an atheist can be acutely aware of spirituality. By rejecting God or gods in any form, an atheist must be aware that the actions of self and others and universe are ruled only be the essential laws and processes of the universe as a system: A crazy, Rube Goldberg kind of contraption much like those amazing Pitagora Suitch devices.

But what are the spiritual rules of these devices, whether or not these rules created or evolved. Spirituality at it’s most basic form is all about the basis for our actions. That is, what creates and shapes the actions and interactions of us as humans as well as everything else: from Ken Wilber’s frisky dirt to the interactions of people, of governments and of corporations.

If an atheist enters into a contract, would you expect that the atheist would fail to honor that contract? Actually, the atheist would honor that contract just as often as a Pope or Rabbi or Minister. Remember, all of these have honored or dishonored contracts at one time or another. It has nothing to do with religion, but specifically if the contract works for the parties involved.

The atheist who honors a contract, can appreciate the spirit and essence of the contract just as well as you or I or anyone else. The atheist’s understanding of that spirit and essence depends on that person’s personality, intelligence and many other factors. The point here is that ’spirit’ is not rejected by the atheist, only ‘God.’ In fact, the atheist needs to be very aware of that separation, which makes a true and thoughtful atheist a spiritually aware person. I’m not talking of a newbie atheist, who at 17, decides that everything he has learned must be rejected, and hastily declares “I am an atheist.” It may take years for that person to truly and finally conclude that there is no God.

It takes a great deal of contemplation to tease the essentials of the rules of proper action away from any religious dogma. After all, if we are only doing something or thinking something to avoid punishment from an angry god, it speaks very poorly of ourselves as sentient, caring, responsible people. But we can be sentient and caring and responsible because we can understand the positive value of being that way: it has nothing to do with God’s Wrath, and everything to do with how we set our internal compass.

I would like to propose that we separate the spiritual aspect of our internal compass from any reference to God’s Word that comes from a book (not that I dislike books, I just think they are written by people, not God). But this post is not about the Bible, it is about the fundamental difference between a belief in God from the ability to embrace a natural and nourishing spirituality.

I’ll leave this post with several open questions:

  • what concepts form a useful basis for our actions?
  • Are these concepts universal?
  • Should they also work for governments and corporations?
  • How different are these rules from the basic statements of the world’s religions?
  • If these concepts are universal, is there a basis for using them to celebrate the sheer goodness of them and how we implement them in life?

Possible Polyamory? Multiple Monogamy?

I revel in possibilities. Practical alternatives to our stalemate with culture, economics, and society. We have been told over and over that the USA is a ‘free country.’ But in what way? there is absolutely nothing free except air and water, and we are paying big-time for Coke and Pepsi to put baby laxative in our bottled water. Yes, look for magnesium sulfate, folks — It’s baby laxative — and you pay for it?

And so with the most important thing of all,our very most personal relationships. So personal that we hesitate to make a connection lest it damage ourselves, or worse, our partner. Damn you if your love turns sour, but double damn me if I inadvertently hurt you through my love for you.Jenny Block, author of <em>Open : Love, Sex and Life in an Open Marriage</em>

And so I am delighted to bring two incredible viewpoints from ladies that are trying to explore new territory and to bring light to what used to be forbidden topics.

The first is from Jenny Block who has given us the insights into an open marriage: a valid agreement for multiple lovers in a committed relationship.

The second is from Suzanne Portnoy who really has had it with monogamy. She is open about liking sex, liking men, and not bashful at all when it comes to saying: “Not Exclusive!” Some would call her a prostitute, but for two things: she does it for free, because she wants to. And with whom she wants to. Both are things that separate her from mere prostitution: she exhibits, neither.

She has authored two books that you should know about: The Not So Invisible Woman, and the erotic memoir: The Butcher, the Baker, the Candlestick Maker.

Can you handle a woman like that? I wonder if many men could, a strong woman should be a national treasure.

The Democrat Problem and an American Solution

Simply stated, the Democratic Party has got too many choices. Two great candidates: Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. One has charisma and is a great orator, the other is a master executive and problem solver.

Both have platforms and viewpoints that are, essentially compatible. Trouble is, the supporters of one are rabid in their dedication to their favorite candidate. And worse, would NOT vote for the other! and would easily be more at ease with Republican Senator John McCain as president!

Like me, I would find it hard to vote for Senator Obama over John McCain. I think Barack is naive and means well but really does lack experience. And I like John, he undoubtedly has the experience, and then some. I really think he is a straight talker: enough so that you can find articles like:

OK, here is the solution: The Democrats can have it for free:
have Hillary and Barack publically join up in a run for the white house with the agreement that each will be president for four years. The next election, the other candidate would run on the top of the ticket. In this fashion, the pair could easily hold the white house for 12 to 16 years. Which candidate will be president first should be decided by an arbitrary and hopefully fair decision: like a public coin toss. Something that we can all say is NOT the result of ’slick-talk’ or campaign financing or lobbies or any political hot-topic.

OK, there is my solution: Obama, you say that you want to have a change in the system? Well there it is — a change to get things going smoothly forward. Hillary, you say that you want to work for the American Public? All of us? Well, roll up your sleeves.

I do not want a politician in the white house. I want a Statesman. Step up.

A Search Engine Optimization Strategy

The mantra of the SEO community is: Content and Backlinks. The MetaGoogle MegaCorporation calculates a site’s worth with some high-falutin’ hueristic that measures the depth of the Moon’s Shadow, the Man’s Piaba and maybe the number of ‘worthy’ links into your site. The worthiness is also a magic quantity that nobody is really sure about.

For me, Jim Hinds, my main interest is romance and relationships: My web pages are Romance Capitol and my therapy page Celarien

I need to get visitors to my site. That is your opportunity also: getting visitors to your site!

So we need a strategy that will put eyeballs on your site and maybe make google happy.

Now, what if there was a secret society that put a whole bunch of web site owners together that:

  1. looked at each other’s site
  2. reviewed each other’s site
  3. encouraged the site owners to post those reviews with proper backlinks on their own site
  4. add those reviews on a slow and daily basis so as not to confuse the Search Engine People
  5. made suggestions to each other’s site
  6. and invited other casinos virtuales onlinejuegos azar portal webcasino bonus no purchase requiredonline gamingjugar al instante pagina webjugar gratis paginas internetganancia casino pagina internetganar premios webfree casino gamejugar paginas internetroulette grand jeupremios dinero pagina internetjuego seguro lineacasinos internacionales internetganar premio portalesruleta webonline internet casinocasino internacional webcasinos espana portal webcasino online europapremio portales webcasino internacional portal webroulette comonline casinosmaquina tragaperras pagina internetvirtual casinodeutsches casino onlinedas beste casino onlineroulette kostenlos online spielenonline blackjackgratis download casinoglucks spielrussisches roulettecasino online costa ricaonline casino einzahlunginternet gewinn spielewww casino online deroulette spiel downloadparty casino bonusonline baccarat spielenbicycle casino gamesswiss online casinolotto am mittwochgolden palace online casinoonline casino und poker portalcasino mit gratis bonus,gratis casino,gratis casino bonusdeutsche online casinocasino tropez bonusvideo poker gratistop online kasinos site owner’s to do the same

Bingo! What do you have? A club that encourages cross-linking. Fair, you only link to those you want to, and Balanced, when you want to. In addition, you have lots of the most web-sophisticated people looking at your site. That is linkreferral.com! An altogether good thing. I estimate that my FREE usage of that service has gotten me over 100 hits in the first week of use alone.

But what is the down side? Well, the way that the Link Referral people encourage site owners to join is to return a fraction of the action. And so it looks a bit like a multi-level marketing program. That’s not entirely bad, especially when you consider that you are not really joining to get rich, just to get more real eyeballs on your site.

Another organization is quite a bit more up ‘in your face’ about the money making aspect. That is You WE (yuwie.com). Here is the funny part: They are actually more fair and honest than the social web services that do NOT give any money back to their users. Does your daughter’s social web site give her any money? If she was on Yuwie, she might get evan a little back.

But money is NOT the big advantage of the Yuwie community. The big secret is that these users are more motivated to look at your yuwie site, simply because they think it will gain them some money. It may, but the effect is that your Yuwie site can point too your REAL site with full RSS links, blog postings and such. Yuwie users will be looking at your content and that can’t be bad.

Check out this video introduction to Yuwie.

It is like a one-two punch to get visitors to your web site: The linkreferral concept joined with the Yuwie concept.

Act now. You can use your on-computer time more fun and more intelligently as well as get more visitors to your site. And that’s pretty much a good thing.

Yup, I’m a “My Name is Earl” fan.

Karma does indeed work in mysterious ways. Even though “The Peoples Choice” awards are history, and ‘Earl’ got passed over, I rejoice that Earl got out of the Slammer.

And got run over again…

We will just have to wait for next season and find out if the show is cancelled … Now that would just delight my evil twin brother over at kegare.org!!!

Blog Footer Plugin for Word Press

We like WordPress. A lot. It is written in the cleanest code, very well structured, efficient, and does a socially useful function.

That’s high praise for a piece of computer software. A socially useful function. Now for my socially not-so-useful reasons, I wanted to run all of my various blogs out of a single directory. That way, I only need to upgrade one directory when a new revision of wordpress comes along.

Easy? Well, mostly. We still have a couple of got-ya! kind of problems every now and then. Like how to select the proper database for the proper blog: that’s simple. Just use a switch statement in the wp-config.php file that selects the proper database from a switch on the HTTP_HOST environment variable.

One small problem, is that one of the blogs needs special code appended in the footer. This html code isn’t shared with the other blogs. Some examples of that kind of code would be ring-specific, affiliate code, hit-tracking code, you know all that kind of stuff.

So I found a plugin entitled ‘WP-GenericFooter” which did 110% of the dirty work. It’s written by David Goldstein. The only thing I needed that Dave didn’t put in the original was that he designed the plugin to put the footer at the end of each posting. I needed it as paart of the real footer at the bottom of the blog page.

It was a no-brainer to change the code to put the text at the bottom rather than at the end of each post. That is due to the great design of Wordpress and the elegant coding of Mr. Goldstein (send him flowers, send him beer, I just want your web-hits).

If you want a wordpress plug-in that puts any html at the bottom footer of your blog here it is:blog footer plugin.

Let me know if it is useful to you!

Story Telling, Psychological Therapy, Learning Computer Science and Video Screenplay all in one!

Story Telling Alice is an interesting approach to education, with some potential uses for teen-therapy.

Youth are totally OK with button pushing, and can juggle the complex nature of computer interaction: we see evidence of that with the popularity of cell-phone texting and video games, etc.

Now while ‘Alice’ is a vehicle for teaching some programming skills, the ‘Story Telling’ variant has more appeal as an avenue for teens to vent and disclose themselves. A big plus is that while they are actually developing and putting the story into the machine, they are NOT interacting with an adult. For a teen, those teen-adult interactions have not gone well for them: that’s a big reason they are alienated. Using the machine can allow a more open communication pathway for them. (for historical resources in that direction see weizenbaum’s experiences with his rogerian style “eliza“)

Here is the storytelling version of ‘Alice‘ (it has been developed by Carnegie-Mellon U with technologies adapted from the ‘Sims’ games)

Things that Everybody Knows but Google.

If I ask the question: “How much percentage of fat is in a fat cell?” I may get several answers: none of which actually address my exact question. Since fat cells normally grow and shrink to hold more, or less fat, the answer is pretty much up in the air. You could say, there is no set percentage. Or the percentage ranges from 1% to 99.9%. or the answer is unknown.

None of these answers, except possibly the one with explicit percentages, could have enough match with any web-accessible document to show up on Google. And there would be an enormous number of results: enough so that the real answer would be totally buried.

A human, armed with the simple knowledge that fat cells shrink and grow, would simply say: “It’s like saying ‘how much air is in a balloon,’” and reply with an analogy that would let me know within seconds of the real answer.

If I ask Google, or any simple web-indexing service, I’ll not get the human’s insight into the true nature of reality. However, let us suppose, that a human answered: A fat cell is 30% fat, and the rest is mostly water. We would know that answer is meaningless and misleading. This would be true of any answer that tried to pin down the real fat content of a cell. Any one without an ulterior motive would answer simply and with the most direct answer possible.

There are any number of questions that Boggle can not answer, simply because it is a basically an indexing scheme with a heuristically organized ratings. Adding artificial intelligence, like http://ask.com/ helps a little, but the state of the art of artificial intelligence has a long, long way to go. If you ask Noam Chomsky, it may never happen.

Even the simplest of questions can cause a stumble, even true and false questions: “is there 50% fat in a fat cell?.” Or even more complicated questions: “How can I reduce the fat quantity of my fat cells to less than 20%?”

Sometimes, a human is the best information provider. Google is great, but it does have it’s limits.

Stupid is as Stupid Does

I visit Guam from time to time, and have been impressed by a recent trend to turn the island from a backward and badly managed one into a haven and hope for all of the cultures of the South Pacific. So I was surprised to see a little gem of insanity entitled: I don’t want DI anymore!

It seems that Guam’s public (and private) schools have been world-class underachievers for years, and years. Some would say that their school system is a joke, but it is too serious to be funny. Everything they had tried only led them to educational failure after failure.

Not being an economic success in any way, shape or form, Guam went on a hunt for more money from the U. S. Federal Government. Who can blame them, the idea of free government grants is pretty compelling. And so they found a multi-million dollar grant that they could spend to improve their schools: all they had to do was implement a system of instruction that actually works. That’s not a big expectation is it? If it works, you can spend the money. If there is no proof that it works, then don’t waste the Federal Government’s (read that as your tax dollars, and my tax dollars) money.

The rant’s author, Elwin Champaco Quitano makes a point that G. W. Bush was in a Direct Instruction Classroom on 9/11. And while he froze on that morning, Elwin, September 11, 2001 was not any fault of Direct Instruction. In fact, The grant that is bailing out Guam’s crazy patchwork of failure came from our President, G. W. Bush (who actually seems to be a poster boy for Guam’s unreformed educational system.) He seems to have followed the advice of one of his wisest advisors: Laura, and advocated for educational reform. Unfortunately, Laura seems pretty silent on other important matters. That’s too bad.

Here it is in a nutshell: there are very few proven methodologies to get ALL children to read, write, and think at a standard level of competence. But there is one, and it’s called Direct Instruction (DI). It breaks the skills for teaching and learning down into the very simple, basic steps that make the best recipe for success. Plain and simple, DI does the job. It is like the mop that gets the floor clean. If you push the mop, you get the floor clean. If you teach using DI methods, the children learn.

And not just rote learning. DI increases the ability to write, think and be effective in our culture. When I walk down the beach in Guam, I am struck by the comments of parents who say that their third grade son is coaching the high school daughter because the son has skills in reading, analyzing and writing that the daughter needs.

Here is the trouble: Direct Instruction requires competent teachers. Teachers that can read and follow instructions. And follow through on their word. And not take their personal problems out on the children. That is the big drawback of DI. DI is a tool to get your island children educated. Just as a mop is a tool to clean the floor, you need to put the proper elbow grease into the job. And not just once: you need to mop that floor every day, and clean every corner, and not let the dirt pile up. Because that one little corner is really some little child who desperately needs the skill that only a competent, patient and dedicated teacher can provide.

The Chomorro people are actually a wise island people. The wisdom of the South Pacific is simple and practical. They know that the small fish always gets eaten by the big fish. This is the opportunity for the children of Guam to grow into the big fish.

People of Guam: Be proud of your island and work to help each other be effective in the world economy. Don’t listen to your straw bosses that are working against your future.

Straw Bosses of Guam: If you want free hand-outs from the Federal Government, you need to be smart enough to realize that there are conditions attached to those hand-outs. Plain and simple. You made a contract with the national government. If you want to back out, there are simple consequences. You pay the money back. If you want to do educational research, that’s quite a different contract. Go for it — after all, you are laboring under the delusion that the federal government has spent ‘billions’ on educational research. But don’t think you can do better than DI.

no, Elwin Champaco Quitano, Zig Engelmann does not perceive your children as stupid and poor. Evidently, you do, except possibly you own children. Zig Engelmann believes that education is for all the children. Why would a teacher not want a level playing field for the children? Even the hard to reach ones. You value education, just as you value cleanliness. After all, when you use that mop, you want to get all the floor clean, don’t you? Your morale as a teacher needs to be focused on the job well done, not on how heavy the mop is.

Children flourish under competent DI instruction. The weak link is those teachers who think they know something that they don’t. Elwin, if you want to get into educational research, that’s great. Change your profession and get into education research with both feet. But know that you will be playing in a different league, with people who are really sharp and really know what they are doing. And if you think teaching using DI is hard, it is far easier than doing real research.

Inspiration from Hillary??

This statement by a 70’s era E.R.A. supporter (I’m one too, just the male variety), awakens an earlier enthusiasm for the vitality of American Politics. The Winner Politics never quite gives you what you want, but at least you feel that every voice got heard… And sometimes, just sometimes, there is a fight worth winning, and a win worth having.

I think, for me, that’s the ultimate draw of Hillary, she is one of us. And she can help us win back some national sanity.

When I say one of us, I mean those of us that witnessed the 1960’s and 1970’s reaction to a government that, well, just went off in the wrong direction. And it did happen. And we heard all the corporate bullshit.

And we followed our myopic government as it went off mad pursuit of a phantom. And we heard the bullets on our Ohio State campus.

Our government told us that we were fighting against the communist menace, but the sad fact is, that China and the USSR learned that spending a small amount on guns and war-stuff, they could keep the USA busy and off-balance from the late 1950’s to the mid 1970’s. If China and the USSR could have baited us into a few more of those unwinnable wars, then the Soviet Union might still be around!

And for a few years, we were smart enough to keep out of those sucker matches. Until we elected our current group of leaders.

So now the USA is in the perfect position to get sucked into many of those unwinnable wars. I feel that we really need some sanity in the White House now. I think Hillary has just the mind-set to get us sane. She’s tough, she’s smart, she is effective. And she knows the right thing to do. Hillary’s my girl.